Conformity assessment is a procedure which demonstrates that device in compliance with MDR.
Notified body (NB) is a conformity assessment body
that performs third-party conformity assessment activities including
calibration, testing, certification and inspection.
Every manufacturer needs to undertake an assessment of
the conformity of that device.
Conformity assessment Annexes are listed below,
1.ANNEX IX CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BASED ON A QUALITY MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM AND ON ASSESSMENT OF TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION
v CHAPTER I QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM(QMS)
v CHAPTER II ASSESSMENT OF THE TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION(TD)
v CHAPTER III ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS (Record Retention)
EU Quality management system certificate , EU technical documentation assessment certificate
2.ANNEX X
CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BASED ON TYPE-EXAMINATION
Product based EU type-examination certificate
3.ANNEX XI CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BASED ON PRODUCT CONFORMITY
VERIFICATION.
v PART A PRODUCTION QUALITY
ASSURANCE
EU Quality assurance certificate
v PART B PRODUCT VERIFICATION
EU Product verification certificate
Note: There is no equivalent MDD Annex VI Product
Quality Assurance conformity assessment route is available in MDR.
Manufacturer can
select conformity assessment route based on device class. MDR CHAPTER V
CLASSIFICATION AND CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT, Article 52 of SECTION 2 Conformity
assessment explains the various conformity assessment routes as given below.
Class III:
1. Option 1: Annex IX.
2.
Option
2: Annex X + Annex XI Part A Production
quality assurance
3. Option 2: Annex X + Annex XI Part
B Product verification
The above options are applicable for Class III
implants/Non-Implants, Devices incorporating a medicinal substance, Tissues or
cells of human/animal origin or their derivatives, Rule 21 (Devices that are
composed of substances or of combinations of substances that are intended to be
introduced into the human body via a body orifice or applied to the skin and
that are absorbed by or locally dispersed in the human body)
Special Cases:
·
Class III Implantable
devices shall follow Clinical Evaluation
Consultation Procedure (Article 54):CER scientific opinion from expert panel
·
Devices incorporating
a medicinal substance: Medicinal product
within the meaning of point 2 of Article 1 of Directive 2001/83/EC):
Scientific opinion from one of the competent authorities designated by the
Member States in accordance with Directive 2001/83/EC or from the EMA (European
Medicine Agency). If the device incorporates a human blood or plasma
derivative or a substance that, if used separately, may be a medicinal product
falling exclusively within the scope of the Annex to Regulation (EC) No
726/2004, the notified body shall seek the opinion of the EMA.
·
Tissues or cells of
human origin or their derivatives:
Scientific opinion from one of the competent authorities designated by the
Member States in accordance with Directive 2004/23/EC (‘human tissues
and cells competent authority’) on the aspects relating to the donation,
procurement and testing of tissues or cells of human origin or their
derivatives.
·
Tissues or cells of
animal origin or their derivatives:
Notified body shall apply the relevant requirements laid down in the Regulation
(EU) No 722/2012.
·
Rule 21 (Devices that are composed of substances or of combinations of
substances that are absorbed by or locally dispersed in the human body):
Scientific opinion from one of the competent authorities designated by the
Member States in accordance with Directive 2001/83/EC or from the EMA.
Class IIb:
·
Option
1: Chapters I QMS and III of Annex IX + Assessment
of the technical documentation (TD). Class IIb-WET & Rule 12-TD assessment
for at least one representative device per generic device group.
Class IIb-Non-WET-TD assessment for every device.
1.
Option
2: Annex X + Annex XI Part A Production
quality assurance
2. Option 2: Annex X + Annex XI Part
B Product verification
Special Cases:
·
Class IIb Rule 12
active devices shall follow Clinical
Evaluation Consultation Procedure (Article 54):CER scientific opinion from
expert panel
Class IIa:Implants /Non Implants:
1.
Option
1: Annexes II and III Technical documentation+ Chapters
I QMS and III of Annex IX
2.
Option
2: Annexes II and III Technical documentation+ Annex XI Part A Production quality assurance
3. Option 3: Annexes II and III Technical documentation+ Annex
XI Part B Product verification
In general, all three options assessment of the
technical documentation(TD) for at least one representative device for
each category of devices.
Class Im/Is/Ir:
1.
Option
1: Annexes II and III Technical documentation+ Chapters
I QMS and III of Annex IX *
2.
Option
2: Annexes II and III Technical documentation+ Annex XI Part A Production quality assurance*
* involvement of the notified body in those procedures
shall be limited:
v
Class
Is: Aspects relating to establishing,
securing and maintaining sterile conditions
v
Class
Im: Aspects relating to
the conformity of the devices with the metrological requirements
v
Class
Ir: Aspects relating to
the reuse of the device, cleaning, disinfection, sterilization,
maintenance and functional testing and the related instructions for use.
Class I:
1. Class I device shall have TD as per Annexes II and
III.
2. Self-certification without involving any Notified body
Custom made devices except Class III Implants:
Annex XIII +Section 8 of Annex IX: Document experience gained in the post-production
phase, including from PMCF
Custom made Class III Implants:
1.
Option
1: Annex XIII + Chapters
I of Annex IX QMS
2.
Option
2: Annex XIII + Annex XI Part A Production
quality assurance
Investigational devices shall be subject to the requirements set out in
Articles 62 to 81.
Click below link to know more about IVDR Conformity Assessment Procedure :https://meddev-info.blogspot.com/2021/04/ivdr-conformity-assessment-procedure.html
Source:
1.REGULATION (EU) 2017/745 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation
(EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council
Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC
2.BSI whitepaper on Medical device clinical investigations – What’s new
under the MDR?
No comments:
Post a Comment